HYPERLOW RS build. Light enough to race, large enought to freestyle.
Photos
Part List
Frame |
HYPERLOW RS
Hyperlowframes.com
|
$60.00 |
Flight Controller |
PyroDrone F4 OSD
(38 builds)
Pirofliprc.com
|
$32.99 |
ESCs |
AIKON AK32 35A 4in1 32 BIT ESC ***UPDATED VERSION***
(49 builds)
Pirofliprc.com
|
$66.00 |
Motors |
Lumenier MB2207-7 2700KV JohnnyFPV Motor
(7 builds)
Pirofliprc.com
|
$28.99 |
FPV Camera |
Runcam Micro Eagle
(323 builds)
Pirofliprc.com
|
$44.99 |
FPV Transmitter |
TBS Unify Pro 5G8 V3 (SMA)
(154 builds)
Team-blacksheep.com
|
$40.95 |
Antenna |
Lumenier AXII U.FL 5.8GHz Antenna (RHCP)
(148 builds)
Getfpv.com
|
$14.99 |
Receiver |
TBS Crossfire Nano RX Special Edition
(412 builds)
Pirofliprc.com
|
$34.95 |
Looks amazing! I really want to get a hyperlow frame for my next 5" build. How does this compare to the CG, and do you lose any durability in the RS (as opposed to the CG)? Looks like some of the underside carbon pieces are a bit small/thin. I'm still leaning toward the RS though, I like the thin arms and lighter overall frame. I have an Alien clone and a flosstyle right now and like them both. But yeah, its really between this or the CG, can't decide on which.
I honestly cant recommend one over the other. The CG carbon is a thing of beauty, and its mounting plates help make it a super clean build, with a bit more room on the inside for electronics and ontop for longer batteries. It will have 30-40 grams over the RS when built, which can help it feel more planted. But the RS is a rocket and handles incredibly with with its stretched x arms. Its hard to say which is more durable. possibly the CG with its wider arm, but the 5mm RS have been holding up great for me so far!
How has the immortal t reception been with the antenna mounted that way?
Been out over a mile with no problems.