Ummagawd Remix with Crossfire

By wrong17 on Jun 04, 2018

7  397  2

The first time I saw this frame I knew I had to try it. By the time I was in the market to purchase the frame I notice 2 other knock off frames. To make a long story short, I spent the extra money and went with the real thing. Here is why you should too. I am not going to link the 2 clone frames, but I will explain the logic of why you should not get the clone.

The first clone is priced at $30.99... can you imagine that; how can that be. I have a friend who purchased this clone and we notice a huge design flaw with it how the lower cage opens up. The authentic Remix camera is stationary when you open the bottom and there is extra support for the camera cage that sandwiched between the frame. But the clone swings from the top of the camera cage so you will need extra length to the FPV camera or you can open the lower frame. Because it swings from the top there is not support for the front of the frame. None of the carbon has chamfered edges so you will NEED to file or sand the edge of the arms where the motor wires wraps under. Whereas the real Remix, most of the parts are has chamfered edges already.

Now the second clone is a bit more expensive and it cost $69.99, so for $30 more you can get the real thing. I never seen the clone in person, so I do not know how the parts are cut in relation to the weave and the quality of the carbon parts. But I can tell you that the clone weighs 21g more. I care a lot about the weight so 21g is a lot to me. The clone comes with 12.9 Carbon Steel hardware, that is great but with the cost of additional weight. The authentic Remix comes with titanium screws so that could be where some of the extra weight and cost be factored in. If you were to buy the Ti screws on your own, I think it would cost you around $20 or more. If you do not care about the extra weight or Ti screws then go for the clone. If you wait for a sale you can get the real deal for around $80.

Before I started my build I watched Tommy's build video so I got a good idea what I need to do. The main difference between the regular build and this frame is how the FC is mounted. You will need to make some changes to Betaflight/Butterflight to change the orientation and the remapping the motors. One complaint I have about this frame is the lack of option to mount the vtx antenna. I am glad that I have a 3D Printer so I can use something from Thingiverse.

Let me just say.... wow. This frame is awesome, I need to do a little more testing, but I wonder if it is better than my Chameleon. It is really a not fair comparison between the setup because I have newer electronics and tuning (Butterflight) compared to the Chameleon. The remix frame feels really smooth and balanced in the air, but it is still a little heavy. I also did my maiden for the QAV ULX right after this first FPV flight and the QAV ULX put this frame to shame in terms of cornering. I would also want to note that the PIDs for all 3 quads are default settings and NO tuning. Could it use some fine tuning... of course, but right it still flies great without it.

Just for fun I did a few speed runs and the best pass that was caught on the radar gun was 69mph:



Sign in to comment

Offset   Jun 13, 2018  

It would be nice if they'd make the body a bit longer so ppl could mount lipo's in the more traditional way, hate that sideways battery stuff and its to short to hold alot of lipo's in the standard fashion, plus you have to 3D mount that gopro so far forward just to make it half work on short lipo's. a little stretch wouldnt hurt anybody. what bollocks, could be such an awsome frame. underslung/Inverted frames are so much better then that awful top heavy business most frames go. they gotta do a 6" option so you don't have to buy another set of arms. don't know why they didn't just make the arms 1/4" longer and be done with it, but what do you do

wrong17   Jun 13, 2018 

I agree with you about the arms, they should have made it a tad longer, so it is 6" ready. It fits the 5.5 props now so why not a little longer. I am not sure why you are having problems with the battery placement unless you are NOT using the 3d printed session mount. I do not have a problem fitting a CHNL 1500mah 4s lipo on this frame long ways. I use the CHNL lipo as an example because it is the largest lipos I have. I was going to buy the 6" arms this weekend but end up not getting it because the 5.5" props are working very well for me. Why change it if it works. Are you mounting the session on the standard mount it comes with? If so, do you catch any props when you are recording? I wonder if that would be a problem if you upgrade to a 6" setup?

Guides & Reviews

1 803 
24 days ago

The Aomway Commander V2s are the 2018 followup to the successful Aomway Commander V1 FPV headset. Unlike their predecessor, which targeted the FatShark Dominator V3s, the Commander V2s have set their sights higher toward the FatShark HD3s. Instead of 16:9 displays with a 32 degree field of view (FOV) the V2s now sport 4:3 displays with an impressive 45 degree FOV. And unlike the HD3s, these switch..

Read more
2 1,840  8
Aug 21, 2018

The FB 009 is a lightweight and compact budget FPV headset. When I first saw this I thought it might be worth a try. I'm never quite sure which headset to recommend at this price point, so let's see how this stands up. Most notably it includes a USB chargeable 1S 1200mah battery which is a decent capacity for an internal battery. The headset is compact and features a 3" 480x320 16:9 display. The..

Read more