Ummagawd Acrobrat Duo - DJI HD - 3 Inch

By Jayembee67 on Jan 17, 2020

10  285  8

I have an original Acrobrat frame built out with SD gear and stacked cameras, and I have really liked that machine; the way it flies and how robust it is.. So when I was thinking about another 3" HD rig (it might well be the only thing we get to fly very soon), I was of course interested to see the new Acrobrat Duo, which made the claim of being compatible with the DJI Air Unit. So I decided to see if that was true.

And it is indeed possible to get an Air Unit and everything else into the frame, but It has taken a good deal of time in TinkerCAD, and then printing multiple iterations of parts, to get it all to fit tidily and securely. It's pretty cramped, but at least these DJI HD builds don't require much soldering, or masses of leads to fit in someplace.

I am a bit unsure about the placement of the video antennas; there is quite a lot of carbon in the way of the prop wash as it is, so putting more stuff down there might not be the best of plans as far as maintaining thrust and minimizing turbulence goes. I'll see how this thing flies, but I might need to move the antennas to the top of the frame. But then they won't have that nice wide separation... Still, on to the next thing for now; tuning, I bet this will need some tuning. These little, heavy, quick machines don't seem to do so well with BF 4.1.x defaults, apparently.

UPDATE 2020-01-18
In the end, I decided to move the video antennas to the back of the frame rather than under the arms. Likely getting a poorer signal, but much cleaner and less obstruction to the rotor wash.

UPDATE 2020-02-05
Final Evolution. This machine been a difficult child. At first it was a mass of rattles and shakes, and once I solved that, it became a battery vampire; voltage sag warnings within 1 minute. And the video feed was poor. Boo.

The battery issue was motors that were too fast for such a heavy quad, 1408 4100kv, were not what was needed. I tried lower pitch props, and got better flight times but at a cost of speed and grip. So I bit the bullet and ordered new motors; 1507 3300kv, a fairly major change inspired by @TaterrsFPV. But it solved my problem and now I am getting 3:30 of perfectly acceptable flying out of an 850mAh pack. Huzzah.

I also moved the DJI antenna back down under the rotor arms; on the back, whilst tidy, they didn't have enough separation and were too much in the battery shadow. And that helped a lot, the video is now much better.

And finally, as the new motors were purple they clashed horribly with the orange TPU parts, so as I needed to reprint a bunch of parts anyhow, I redid the colour scheme. It's finally the machine I had hoped it would be, which is good, you don't want to waste a DJI build, far too expensive...

Maiden Flight of the final setup. Quite acceptable considering it was blowing a gale out there:

Photos

Discussion

Sign in to comment

MakeitHappen   25 days ago  

How is the flight time with XING 1408 4100KV? Having a hard time on which motors to use, since I keep reading this frame is on the heavy side. Would higher kv be better on 3inch props vs lower kv?

Jayembee67   23 days ago 

To be honest I am no expert with 3" machines, and so I am sort-of-guessing myself. And in truth, were I to do this build again, I think I would go with 3600kv XING 1408 motors.

The problem I am experiencing with this machine is that it is absolutely brutal on my batteries. I'm using 850mAh Tattu 95c packs, which are fine on my other 3" builds, but if I don't fly conservatively, I can get voltage warnings after 1min of flight with the Acrobrat; it's horribly saggy. I can get over 3:30 of decent flight, but I have to be careful. I just checked, and my voltage meter was a little off, but I think it's mostly the weight and higher-draw motors.

All of which is a shame as it flies nicely. I had gyro issues with the first FC, but once that was replaced, it's been flying very well. But it feels like I have this upper range to the throttle that I just can't use, so I think that the 3600kv motors might have been better. But, caveat emptor, I haven't had the chance to test with 3600s... :-/

MakeitHappen   16 days ago 

Thank you for your reply and thoughts on this. I'm still new to this and trying to get the weight to thrust ratio thing.

Yourinnate   23 days ago  
1

Great build! Just put our curiosity, could you squeeze 4 inch props on this bad boy?

Jayembee67   23 days ago 

Thank you! Sadly no, 3" props only. And with the Air Unit where it is, there is barely clearance for 3".

ICARU5   29 days ago  
1

Looks great! 👍
Would you share the 3D parts pls?

Jayembee67   29 days ago 
1

Thank you! And of course, you can find them here: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4114427

ICARU5   29 days ago 

thanks a lot! :-)

Guides & Reviews

21 4,093  20
Nov 30, 2019

In late 2019 DJI made inroads into the FPV scene with their remarkable low-latency digital system. It gave us a 720p video feed with latency on-par with the status quo, analog video. Traditionally we've used analog video systems for low-latency video, but the video quality is far from ideal. It's a trade-off we've been willing to accept for the control. Now we've got the best of both worlds and what..

Read more
3 3,710  10
Sep 18, 2019

When the FatShark HDOs hit the market in 2018 the FPV community rejoiced for the new Sony OLED displays. While they lacked further upgrades like an updated DVR and power button they were still a market success. With the 2019 announcement of the Orqa FPV.One the community finally had a potential HDO killer on the horizon. With only weeks before the release of the Orqa FPV.One Skyzone came out of left..

Read more